000 06788nam a22006615i 4500
001 978-981-13-1232-8
003 DE-He213
005 20201217111344.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 180723s2018 si | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9789811312328
_9978-981-13-1232-8
024 7 _a10.1007/978-981-13-1232-8
_2doi
072 7 _aLNJ
_2bicssc
072 7 _aLAW000000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aLNJ
_2thema
082 0 4 _a343.099
_223
245 1 0 _aMulti-dimensional Approaches Towards New Technology
_h[electronic resource] :
_bInsights on Innovation, Patents and Competition /
_cedited by Ashish Bharadwaj, Vishwas H. Devaiah, Indranath Gupta.
250 _a1st ed. 2018.
264 1 _aSingapore :
_bSpringer Singapore :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2018.
300 _aXXV, 337 p. 13 illus., 4 illus. in color.
_bonline resource.
336 _btxt
337 _bc
338 _bcr
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
500 _aIT Carlow ebook
505 0 _aIntroduction -- 1. Unwired Planet v. Huawei: Major Progress in Putting "FRAND" into FRAND Licensing -- 2. The Role of the European Commission in the Development of the ETSI IPR Policy and the nature of FRAND in Standardization -- Blockchain Technology in Aid of Trademark Protection -- Understanding the Nuances in the Interplay Between IPRs and Competition Law -- Do Strategic Actions Speak Louder Than Words? A Framework to Formulate a National IP Policy -- The Development and Theoretical Controversy of SEP Licensing Practices in China -- The Interaction Between IP and Competition Laws in the EU: Necessity of Convergent Interpretation with the Principles Established by Relevant Case Law -- IP, patents and competition law in Australia -- Regulating Abuse of SEPs in Mobile Communications Market: Reviewing the Qualcomm Cases in Korea -- "Predatory" patent practices: A telecom perspective -- The Demographics of Intellectual Property -- Innovation, economic value and welfare implications of digital economy -- Market competition and IP infringement in the solar off-grid sector -- Innovation and Intellectual Property: Perspectives from Indian Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs) -- When Competition Agencies Harm Competition: Essential Patents -- Antitrust Economics in the New Digital Economy -- Standard Essential Patents vis-à-vis IPR and Competition Law in India - Is there a Regulatory Overlap? -- Classic Theory of Tort Liability and Infringement of SEPs: A Law and Economics Approach -- A shift in the perception of SDO role and policy, and the impact on SEPs, FRAND licensing, and standard setting processes -- How Should Antitrust Law Account for Innovation as an Aspect of Competitive Analysis? -- Competition Law and Standard Essential Patent (SEP) in India: Reminiscences of a Commissioner -- Interplay of competition and IPR elements: Case of the payment and settlement systems market in India.
506 0 _aOpen Access
520 _aThis open access edited book captures the complexities and conflicts arising at the interface of intellectual property rights (IPR) and competition law. To do so, it discusses four specific themes: (a) policies governing functioning of standard setting organizations (SSOs), transparency and incentivising future innovation; (b) issue of royalties for standard essential patents (SEPs) and related disputes; (c) due process principles, procedural fairness and best practices in competition law; and (d) coherence of patent policies and consonance with competition law to support innovation in new technologies. Many countries have formulated policies and re-oriented their economies to foster technological innovation as it is seen as a major source of economic growth. At the same time, there have been tensions between patent laws and competition laws, despite the fact that both are intended to enhance consumer welfare. In this regard, licensing of SEPs has been debated extensively, although in most instances, innovators and implementers successfully negotiate licensing of SEPs. However, there have been instances where disagreements on royalty base and royalty rates, terms of licensing, bundling of patents in licenses, pooling of licenses have arisen, and this has resulted in a surge of litigation in various jurisdictions and also drawn the attention of competition/anti-trust regulators. Further, a lingering lack of consensus among scholars, industry experts and regulators regarding solutions and techniques that are apposite in these matters across jurisdictions has added to the confusion. This book looks at the processes adopted by the competition/anti-trust regulators to apply the principles of due process and procedural fairness in investigating abuse of dominance cases against innovators.
650 0 _aMass media.
_998774
650 0 _aLaw.
_998775
650 0 _aPrivate international law.
_998776
650 0 _aConflict of laws.
_92543
650 0 _aLaw and economics.
_99649
650 0 _aEconomic policy.
_998777
650 0 _aManagement.
_998778
650 0 _aIndustrial management.
_94612
650 1 4 _aIT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property.
_0https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R15009
_998779
650 2 4 _aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law .
_0https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R14002
_998780
650 2 4 _aLaw and Economics.
_0https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/W39000
_99649
650 2 4 _aR & D/Technology Policy.
_0https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/W43000
_998781
650 2 4 _aInnovation/Technology Management.
_0https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/518000
_998782
700 1 _aBharadwaj, Ashish.
_998783
700 1 _aDevaiah, Vishwas H.
_998784
700 1 _aGupta, Indranath.
_998785
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
_930940
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9789811312311
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9789811312335
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9789811324529
856 0 _ySend a message to library staff if access to this online resource is unavailable
_uhttps://tinyurl.com/y2hljxwd
856 4 0 _yLink to Springer open access ebook
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1232-8
912 _aZDB-2-LCR
912 _aZDB-2-SXLC
912 _aZDB-2-SOB
999 _c49511
_d49511